<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A challenge for Body language &#8216;experts&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seductionlabs.org/2009/02/01/a-challenge-for-body-language-experts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seductionlabs.org/2009/02/01/a-challenge-for-body-language-experts/</link>
	<description>The method of science; the craft of seduction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cleaw</title>
		<link>http://www.seductionlabs.org/2009/02/01/a-challenge-for-body-language-experts/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>cleaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seductionlabs.org/?p=436#comment-833</guid>
		<description>I agree that there is no published research of the phenomenon of &#039;crocodile tears&#039; and false appeals; it is for that reason that I am currently studying for a doctorate on cues to deception in false appeals. I&#039;m looking at most of the cases that you have mentioned - although for some of them it is difficult to find footage. Preliminary indications are that there are clusters of behaviour that distinguish false appealers from real appealers, and that there are people that are able to do this reliably. I hope to establish a model of behaviours that is predictive of deception in this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is no published research of the phenomenon of &#8216;crocodile tears&#8217; and false appeals; it is for that reason that I am currently studying for a doctorate on cues to deception in false appeals. I&#8217;m looking at most of the cases that you have mentioned &#8211; although for some of them it is difficult to find footage. Preliminary indications are that there are clusters of behaviour that distinguish false appealers from real appealers, and that there are people that are able to do this reliably. I hope to establish a model of behaviours that is predictive of deception in this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
